Strike Energy seeks to outbid Hancock for Warrego

Silhouette of gas plant and worker (strike hancock)
Gas plant (Image: Shutterstock)

Australian gas producer Strike Energy has made a takeover offer for Perth-based Warrego Energy with hopes of outbidding Hancock Energy, Reuters reports.

Strike made a bid of 37.5 cents per share, valuing Warrego at approximately $459 million. The offer represents a 4.2% premium to Hancock’s sweetened 36 cents-per-share bid, which values Warrego at $440 million.

Related article: Beach withdraws from Warrego takeover negotiations

Warrego, which holds the West Erregulla gas fields in Western Australia, has been at the centre of a number of buyout bids in the recent past, attracting offers from gas players such as Beach Energy.

“West Erregulla gas fields deliver some of the cheapest gas in Australia, which is used for power generation and processing of minerals and the bidding war is likely to play out longer as some very determined bidding parties are involved in the play,” IG Australia market analyst Tony Sycamore told Reuters.

Hancock Energy said its offer extended to Warrego shareholders, who had earlier accepted its lower bid of 28 Australian cents apiece, but were conditional on the energy company achieving a 40% shareholder acceptance.

Hancock advised Warrego shareholders who supported rival bidder Strike’s offer that they may not be eligible for capital gains tax rollover relief, given that Hancock already owns more than 25% of Warrego.

Strike holds a 19.9% stake in the Perth-based energy company.

Strike warned Warrego shareholders that accepting Hancock’s bid “places a terminal value” on their shares, and that there was a potential for shareholders to benefit from further share price upside if they accept its bid.

Related article: National cabinet passes gas and coal price cap legislation

Strike shares are trading 2.7% higher at 38.5 Australian cents on Friday, valuing its one-for-one scrip bid higher than Hancock’s cash offer. Warrego shares have more than doubled in value since the takeover tussle began last November.

“It just depends on whether shareholders think there’s greater value in taking that money and running or sitting there and waiting patiently for it to appreciate in the future,” Sycamore said.

Previous articlePhoenix Pumped Hydro project gets $7 million grant
Next articleDelivering CCUS infrastructure for the net zero transition